000webhost

Web hosting
Showing posts with label Windows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Windows. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Writing Bootable ISO/IMG files to USB Flash drives, Ping S59 Review, and More

- I guess this is an iteration of the following blog post:
- over time, I've figured out that most of the standard methods of writing to USB flash drives can be flawed and that there's nothing really, genuinely reliable when it comes to both writing to the flash drive itself. It's as though each operating system or distribution requires it's own special tool
- figured out that the only reliable means of writing ISO is Etcher, Universal USB Installer, and Unetbootin. dd is constantly mentioned but isn't that great because there's no pre-check or post-check validation. This means all sorts of wierd problems can crop up when using it or similarly basic utilities. One huge problem has been the use of hybrid filesystems and uncommon filesystem extensions which means that many utilities break
Universal USB Installer: most mainstream distributions. Uses 7-Zip tool in backend
Unetbootin: most mainstream distributions
Etcher: KNOPPIX (most later versions require Etcher. Too many problems with other tools for newer versions)
dd: elementary (this is one of the few distros that can use dd straight up)
Windows: WinSetupFromUSB, WinToFlash
- some of the really wierd problems that I've encourted include: not being able to find/boot the correct image, not being able to find the path to common binaries that are required on boot (including kernel modules and iptables), not being able to boot at all (non-compliance means that BIOS/UEFI can't pick up whether it is a bootable disk), filesystem corruption, etc...
- writing Win based images isn't that easy even though it's the most used operating system in the world. There are few free utilities that are about to deal with it that can be used across the entire recent historical series of Windows
- Mac OS X obviously has alternate means as well. The main problem with Mac OS X is that it's a system unto it's own. There aren't too many utilities to allow writing of images from other operating systems without paid software and Apple are a pain because they continually change their filesystems which means others have a difficult time catching up. In fact, I've found the easiest option to be to download Mac OS X from someone elses computer and write the image to flash drive from there

- recently picked up some Ping S59 irons cheaply. If you don't know about these they're basically an old attempt by Ping to create a cast blade style iron. They're a bit ugly (compliments to their later design such as the iBlade which is very pretty) when compared to many other blades but performance wise it should stand to reason that they'd be somewhat similar to other blade shaped irons 
- there are two versions of the S59. One is the standard version while the other is the Tour version. There's basically no difference apart from the fact that the S59 Tour version comes in a chrome (versus matte/satin finish) and the S59 Tour version comes with a ferrule
- my version came with the ZZ65 stiff shaft. Apparently, they play somewhat similarly so stiff Dynamic Gold Superlites and somewhere between stiff and extra stiff according to what I've read online. In reality, this means that they're lighter then the Dynamic Gold equivalent, go a bit higher, and slightly stiffer. That said, few players are good enough to genuinely tell the difference. They are genuinely proper stiff shafts though. They come with either Dynamic Gold, ZZ65 as standard
True Temper ZZ65 Stiff Shaft
dynamic gold vs project x
project x vs dynamic gold vs rifle
- the feel is a bit odd. Hit it in the wrong place (sweet spot on these things feel more centred and less towards the bottom as you'd expect from perimeter weighted clubs) and it feels dead (according to everyone online). This is radically different from the classic stinging/jarring effect that you get from standard blades. Hit it dead centre and it feels spongy/soft though. It offers the genuine feedback that you'd expect from a classic blade. It's exactly the type of club that you'd want especially if you want to transition into becoming a better player who can work his shots. Namely, someone who can alter trajectory, shape shots, etc... by changing where they hit on the clubface and by manipulating the clubface to their own personal will
- one thing I've always wondered is how professional golfers are able to hit the ball so far even though their swing speed numbers (on most launch monitors I've been averaging around 115mph using driver while maintaining good control) were very similar to mine. One issue is that pros often play in ideal conditions (higher then sea level which means the ball travels further, play on courses which are well maintained, they may be gaming some numbers (which is why things don't add up sometimes), etc...). The other came down to being fit properly (I've actually been known about this for a while but I honestly didn't think that changing equipment would make a difference but it has). I wasn't attacking upwards enough while using my driver and wasn't hitting downwards enough with my irons which meant that I was about 20-30m short of where I should be (by simply changing equipment slightly (lofts and shafts primarily. Club length changes have allowed me to swing more comfortably/quickly as well) I was able to change both static and dynamic loft which made the difference mostly disappear). When you think about this from a cumulative perspective of an entire round you can see how big of a difference it can make to your entire game
does iron shaft make a difference distance
- if you don't already know there is optimisation software built into many launch monitors now
- while we're at it I realised recently that putter fitting makes a difference as well. Ironically, I also realised that optimisation is actually more critical when you play regularly in less ideal/horrible conditions then when you're constantly playing in a perfect environment. Going to a full offset putter has made things slightly easier for me especically on courses with bumpy and/or inconsistent greens
half offset vs full offset putter
- if you don't already know Ping aftermarket support is pretty, damn good. Relatively quick and reasonably priced which is what you want. A backweight (the black rubber bit on the back of the S59 came off of one my clubs but was replaced for free via it's local distributer American Golf

Random Stuff:
- as usual thanks to all of the individuals and groups who purchase and use my goods and services
- latest in science and technology
Gene-edited animal plan to relieve poverty in Africa
telecommunication industry by country
- latest in finance and politics
Crowdfunding research flips science’s traditional reward model
- latest in defense and intelligence
- latest in animal news
- latest in music and entertainment

Random Quotes:
- "The older I get, the more I realise how similar we all are," says Missy, now 35. "When I was young, I was afraid of most people. I was sceptical that anyone could be trusted. Then you realise that behind the facade, everyone is still a little child; everyone is vulnerable. And when they lash out or put you down, it's usually not about you."
- “The people know these are all lies because it’s obvious. When the government says, there is prosperity in terms of food and rice, we see it ourselves and see that there is a drought and there is no food for us,” Kim said.

“When they see that what they say doesn’t match with what is actually happening, they understand the government is lying.”

The one thing that North Koreans can’t know, according to Kim, is the actual disparity between the country and other nations like the US, South Korea, or China.

“They know [those countries are more prosperous and developed], but they don’t know at what level and how different the countries are. They have no frame of reference. All the government says are lies, Kim said. “They have no way to obtain information about what South Korea or the United States look like.”

As Kim told the International Business Times in 2017, he and his family thought it was normal to “have our freedoms restricted.” It was only upon arriving in South Korea that Kim said he realised “how unhappy we were.”
- A handful of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters built during the early days of the program could become unflyable by 2026, after just 2,100 flight hours-another embarrassing piece of news for the troubled program. The culprit is almost certainly the F-35’s design and production plan, which involved starting to build the planes before the final design specifications were set. A fix to keep the aircraft in the air is in the works.

According to Aviation Week and Bloomberg News, a static test (non-flying) version of the F-35B-the Marine Corps' vertical takeoff and landing version-has developed multiple structural cracks during durability testing. The static test plane, BH-1, was built to the same standard as early F-35Bs, though redesigns since then have made more recently built planes more durable.

Each F-35B is supposed to have a service lifetime of 8,000 hours. But this operational test and evaluation report on the F-35 suggests that early-model F-35Bs could be limited to just 2,100 hours, which means the fighters would start aging out by 2026. The 8,000-hour life span is about typical for combat aircraft, with the F-15 and F-16 fighters originally rated for 8,000 and 9,000 hours, respectively.

As is the case with many F-35 problems and cost overruns, you can blame the Pentagon’s use of "concurrency" to field the F-35. Under the concurrency concept, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin started building the jets before the development process was finished. This was done to warm up production lines and supply chains and get the aircraft into the hands of pilots who could start training early.

Concurrency carries big risks. Aircraft built before the final design standards were set in stone would need hardware and software updates, and determining which planes needed what to bring them up to the final standard will be a complicated and expensive endeavor. Although engineers have identified changes that could keep early-model F-35Bs flying the full 8,000 hours, we don’t know the complexity and cost of such an upgrade.
- A WIDOW whose house was placed under siege from "Happy Gilmore" golfers at a nearby driving range at Plenty was awarded $15,000 damages today.
Judge Chris O’Neill said he was satisfied the barrage of golf balls landing in Denise Chapman’s property from the Plenty Views Golf Park constituted a legal nuisance.

He said the award was warranted for the inconvenience, discomfort, apprehension and concern, and to some extent the need to collect the golf balls.

“While most patrons behave responsibly, a proportion drives the golf balls with great vigour, but without great accuracy,” said Judge O’Neill in his County Court judgment.

“There was reference in the evidence to “Happy Gilmore golfers”, so named after a character in a movie who was known to run at the golf ball and take an energetic swing, with unpredictable results.

“In my view the activities upon the golf range resulting from patrons striking golf balls into the Chapman property over the period from May 2007 does constitute a nuisance.”

The judge also granted an injunction and ordered that the Plenty Views Golf Park must stop using the golf range in such a way that it “permits the entry of golf balls onto the plaintiff’s property, so as to cause a nuisance”.

Ms Chapman and her children collected 20,000 golf balls from the property in the two years after they moved in.

The judge said in the five years before the Chapman family took occupation Robert Di Carlo, the range manager, arranged for a diver to go into the dam on the property where he recovered 10,000 golf balls.

This was repeated in 2004 or 2005, when another 5,000 golf balls were collected.

The judge said Ms Chapman bought the property in Heard Avenue, Plenty in 2007 for $700,000 and has lived there with her five children. Her husband died in 2004.

The golf park in Yan Yean Rd has a car park, a restaurant, 20 golf driving bays set in a line, and a large fairway with holes or markers set at various distances.

Judge O’Neill said no part of the original 1997 permit to establish the golf park contained a condition that a net be constructed to stop golf balls going into the Chapman property.

He said some golfers were known to target landmarks in the area, including the dam on the Chapman’s five-acre property.

From January 2007 to December 2007, approximately 2.4 million golf balls were struck from the bays of the golf range. In the period from January 2008 December 2008, a further 1.8 million golf balls were struck.

In their defence the owners of the range said they spent a considerable amount of money to alter bays, erect nets and increase supervision of patrons.

Judge O’Neill said none of the measures had significantly reduced the problem.

Monday, April 16, 2018

Dealing with Legacy Applications, Random Stuff, and More

- this post is to help outline some methods for dealing with legacy applications...
- compatibility mode works for a lot of programs but sometimes you don't have a choice but other means
- emulation layers such as Wine, Bochs, DosBox, etc... There has even been talk of emulators for older operating systems (such as DOS and Windows 95/98) out there
- watch for strangeness when using emulation layers. Performance issues, bits and pieces not quite fitting in, etc... Be prepared to have to do some work to make things work properly. Some of the underlying programs can be difficult to use so look out for shell, optimisation type programs and templates...
best settings theme hospital dosbox
dos games on windows 7
theme hospital runs slow in dosbox
Theme Hospital - Bullfrog (1997)
windows 98 emulation layer
9xbox fork of DosBox specifically for Windows.
- try running things in a separate virtual machine
- try running things in a seperate server
- some programs re-used backend data to create a new frontend. Total number of applications that have this done is minimal though. The total number of people who can genuinely reverse engineer binary (even text) file formats and programs out there is relatively small based on what I've seen. Tips on this elsewhere on my blog...
theme hospital on windows 7
hospital-22012015.zip
- if you're lucky you search for newer version that is still compatible with your operating system. The best way to achieve this is via basic web search. Thankfully, a lot of older/legacy software allows for re-use of serials along the chain
"delphi 3" on "windows 7"
"delphi 4" on "windows 7"
game maker
- if that fails look at P2P locations for file names, etc... Worry about the legitimacy of P2P sites because they may be carrying trojans and/or spyware. If it's your last resort use something like virustotal.com as a bare minimum
torrent delphi
delphi 7 and 2006 code compatibility
- else, you may need to build a custom 'fuzzer'. Conceptually, looking for 200 as opposed to 404 return status. Experience tells me that for the most part file fuzzing is a useless technique especially when the company is 'larger then average'. Larger then average entails more files which entails unique filenames and directory structures which can not be easily guesstimated which means a fuzzer is relatively useless. It needs to be an intelligent fuzzer which combines spidering/crawling capability whenever possible (look over my past work for further details). For anyone just looking to try/test new software before public release this is a nice way of doing it. Sample code is on my website and blog for anyone who's interested (look for crawling and spidering software samples as well)...
web file fuzzer
- you'll need to keep up with updates and services packs for a lot of Microsoft (and some other company's) software even if it may be 'legacy software'. The painful thing is that the updates often only become security updates later on which means you'll lose functional updates down the line at some point. This generally applies to both commercial as well as Free and Open Source (FOSS) software
microsoft sql server desktop engine
sql server 2005 service pack 3
How To Apply the Microsoft® SQL Server® 2005 Service Pack 3
SQLServer2005SP3-KB955706-x64-ENU.exe
- look for alternate/compatible solutions. For instance Delphi and Open Pascal/Lazarus are very cross compatible based on what I've read online. alternativeto.net is a great website to look at alternate choices
sample code delphi
open source lazarus projects
open source delphi projects
delphi free 2010
visual studio online
- nightmare scenario is when you have the license but have lost the serial number. Thankfully, prior to the world of authentication a lot of software was reliant on pure serial numbers for 'registration' and to move a product from trial to full . In fact, there were serial databases for programs online (such as Serials2K). For those programs whose serials can't be found in such databases they can often be found online. Sometimes, there are methods to extract the code that you used to install your software originally (from the Windows registry or some other file) but this often requires a specialised utility
extract windows 7 serial number
https://www.howtogeek.com/206329/how-to-find-your-lost-windows-or-office-product-keys/
https://www.lifewire.com/how-to-find-your-windows-7-product-key-2625112
Baixar Delphi 7 + Serial - YouTube
Video for delphi 7 serial number
BLOG : www.phsoft.blogspot.com
Delphi 7 : Serial : 6AMD-PKG68E-DB8PP7-9SFE Key : 3QH-9QW
delphi 7 enterprise serial
Serialkey preview: 6AMD-PKG68E-DB8PP7-N7GE
Key: S6J-8AW
- for certain software you don't really have a choice but to deal with crackers since activation/registration systems are no longer online. Multiple types of bypassing: debuggers, crackers (similar to the devices that you see in the movies that are used to bypass physical security systems. See my book on 'Cloud and Internet Security' for further details regarding this), etc... I may supply code for a simplistic 'cracker' later on but fundamentally it's not that much different then some of the 'bot code' that I have mentioned elsewhere on my blog (it will be so rudimentary that it will be effectively useless. Most modern registration systems rely on activation schemes now or else multi layers of serial numbers which are unrealistic to crack for most people without some 'genuine hard work')
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2015/08/cracking-combination-lock-some-counter.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2015/07/ableton-and-ableton-push-hacking.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2015/07/python-decompilation-max4live.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2015/05/installing-logic-9-under-mac-os-x-under.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2017/07/installing-logic-x-under-mac-os-x-under.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2011/03/eeepc-recovery-without-recovery.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2012/05/fujitsu-stylistic-st4120-recovery.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2018/03/midi-fighter-pro-firmware-flashing.html
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2011/08/unlocking-your-phonemodem.html
algorithm iterating serial alphanumeric
java password cracker
find serial ollydbg
delphi password cracker
- there are obviously interesting methods to protect/defend software against licensing/registration 'attacks'. Activation is obvious but I've often seen cases where they've had no choice but to drop it because it caused more problems then it fixed
visual studio 2005 activation crack
1. Check license repeatedly
2. Use multiple licensing checking layers
3. Use encrypted dlls
4. Check for the hash of your exe/dll to detect tampering
5. Do not display failures immediately
6. Don't use explicit error messages
7. Crash or fail or output incorrect results when license check fails
8. Embed user information in generated licenses
- go after newer downloads that are compatible with your files and Operating System. Like I said you can do a search, use/build a custom fuzzer, etc... you should be able to find something useful especially if the program registration system is still compatible with your version. Note, Multi-National and Trans-national companies (MNC/TNC) have this problem as well as smaller firms (they rarely ever look to see whether a user has been authenticated prior to allowing downloads)...
http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2018/02/bypassing-ejay-downloader-manager.html
search based on MD5 checksum
9d4bac568aced7f1f82d4a44124fb37c 
ID: 30352, Delphi and C++Builder 10 Seattle ISO
download delphi
"delphi 2006" download url
"delphi 2010" download url
Delphi 2010 and C++Builder 2010 ISO
bds2006disk1.iso
[   ] BDS2006Disk1.iso  540.24Mb  October 8 2010 at 05:28
[   ] BDS2006Disk2.iso  494.24Mb  October 8 2010 at 05:28
[   ] BDS2006Disk3.iso  517.60Mb  October 8 2010 at 05:28
[   ] BDS2006Disk4.iso  224.03Mb  October 8 2010 at 05:28
[TXT] md5-суммы.txt  194.00b  October 8 2010 at 05:18
Delphi_C++Builder2009.iso
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Apache
ETag: "0b4c1e5542dd7cc169e5d85044a9cb33:1363822171"
Last-Modified: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:16:38 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 2021038080
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:50:00 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
delphi 2006 iso
- company mergers aren't necessarily a bad thing. Most of the time they just change domains but not file naming and directory structure when they 'switch servers'
- if you can't actually get a copy of the legacy software in question online then try op-shops, specialist software boutiques, retailers, libraries, user/enthusiast groups, organisations which are likely to have a 'spare legacy copy', etc... If not too difficult then try building something from the outset by yourself that is compatible (requires 'reverse engineering' skills though as mentioned above)
http://www.computerbank.org.au/shop/stocklist/
- as an aside, if you've worked in this are you'll realise that there is basically no such as thing as genuine 'computer security'. There's only more and less security? It's much easier to attack then defend. When someone tells you that they can break into a system it's not much a statement if you understand the defender's perspective. Most of the people you see/hear about (even professionals) aren't genuine 'security experts' in the way that the average person is taught. Listen to a lot of their debates and lectures and it becomes obvious that a lot of their work is not that much different from a variation from a lot of the scripts that I use on this blog/website?
The Big Security Debate - Sydney Edition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVY8w49bHgY

Random Stuff:
- as usual thanks to all of the individuals and groups who purchase and use my goods and services
- latest in science and technology
usb graphics for crypto mining
usb graphics card mining 
Windows Mobile for Government - Common Criteria certification
cheat theme hospital reputation
- latest in finance and politics
- latest in defense and intelligence
- latest in animal news
- latest in music and entertainment

Random Quotes:
- Pogue claims the report also shatters another common perception of cyber security, “that of the teenage hacker living in a basement”.

The report found that three-quarters of respondents were college graduates and nearly one-third (32%) had post-graduate degrees. The majority (57%) worked for medium-sized, large, or enterprise businesses.

“When organisations develop their cyber security strategies, they may have IT, legal, risk, and human resources teams at the table but the one person they never invite is the bad guy,” Pogue said. “It’s no wonder that so many security strategies are misdirected.

“The Nuix Black Report 2018 is an opportunity to bring the adversary to the table and have the hackers themselves tell you what’s most effective for your security efforts.”
- These results suggest the Iron Dome debate has been too polarized. The system’s initial value may have been largely symbolic. But it later become very influential.

That’s good news for Israel and its American funder. It’s also reassuring for potential Iron Dome buyers facing missile threats in other parts of the world.

Only Azerbaijan has purchased any systems so far. But the U.S. Army may buy some for short-range air defence. (Canada only bought the radar.)

However, the system isn’t “the end of rockets.” Attackers can counter interceptors by firing rockets in large batches. Indeed, Israel’s opponents keep acquiring more rockets. Hamas in strife-filled Gaza reportedly has 10,000. Hezbollah in Lebanon has 120,000. That latter arsenal would severely strain Israeli interceptors during any future “Northern War.”

Similarly, sophisticated attackers use technology to make their missiles hard to intercept. In their Syria strike, America and its allies used difficult-to-detect cruise missiles. Defenders can’t intercept what their radars can’t see.

Ender 3v2 and Ender 3vSE 3D Printer Maintenance, Klipper Firmware Upgrade, and More

Ender 3v2 and Ender 3vSE 3D Printer Maintenance: - after using a 3D printer for a few months now it's started to play up. The limit ...